Political order in crises discourse (on the example of transitional societies)

The article deals with the question of persuasiveness explanation socio-economic crises in transitional societies paradigm exclusive responsibility for this so-called political order. analysis most well-known concepts about causes decline societies, on one hand, confirms dependence economic situation effectiveness governance, but, other shows that focusing only institutions limits hermeneutic ability a one-factor approach. Excessive emphasis role order leads to ignoring factors development — geographical, cultural, ethnic and others. author assumes as mode functioning system is carried out through activity administrative filled social substrate certain identity, including cultural ethnic, these identities often guide his actions. On level public welfare depends presence inclusive institutions. type restrained by parochial culture population countries. Such emerges from pre-modern connections its rudiment, embedded psychology. It became basis neopatrimonial economy, when resources are distributed group „big men”. sole country correct sense, impossible without national unity. At same time, unity much wider range issues than just creation effective Even reduced rule, last formed will product choice, which determined not political, but also people.